$675,000 RIAA File Sharing Verdict is ‘Unreasonable’

The nation’s second file sharing defendant to challenge the Recording Industry Association of America at trial is asking the court for a retrial, or to reduce the $675,000 verdict the jury levied for infringing 30 songs. Among other claims, lawyers for defendant Joel Tenenbaum asserted Monday this summer’s verdict was unconstitutionally excessive – an argument, in essence, that a penalty of $22,500 a song is simply too big, shocks the conscience and is “obviously unreasonable.” But that argument is a long-shot at best. A similar one is pending in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset litigation — the nation’s first file sharing case where a Minnesota jury dinged her $1.92 million for 24 songs this summer.

Read more here:
$675,000 RIAA File Sharing Verdict is ‘Unreasonable’

Stumbleupon

Related posts:

  1. RIAA Fears Thomas Keeps File Sharing, Despite $2 Million Verdict
  2. Settlement Rejected in ‘Shocking’ RIAA File Sharing Verdict
  3. Last-Ditch Effort to Scuttle RIAA File Sharing Verdict
  4. RIAA Seeks up to $150,000 a Song in File Sharing Trial

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010 P2P News

Leave a Reply