AFACT v iiNet: Safe Harbor Protection Intact, Says iiNet

The trial continues in the copyright infringement case of AFACT – representing several Hollywood studios – and Aussie ISP iiNet (multiple links to all our earlier coverage can be found here and here and here ) The case continued in the Federal Court, with iiNet barrister Richard Cobden beginning his closing submissions. Referring to the allegations by AFACT that it detected around 97,000 instances of copyright infringement carried out by iiNet subscribers, Cobden said that there was actually only sufficient evidence to prove that a single subscriber had carried out any. That individual was the mole planted by AFACT and DtecNet to carry out deliberate ‘infringements’ on behalf of the plaintiffs.

Here is the original post:
AFACT v iiNet: Safe Harbor Protection Intact, Says iiNet

Related posts:

1. AFACT v iiNet: Tiny Bits of BitTorrent Transfers Aren’t Illegal
2. AFACT v iiNet: Judge Asked To Disregard iiNet Evidence
3. AFACT v iiNet: Day 8 – Anti-Piracy Evidence Lacking
4. AFACT v iiNet: Barrister Tears Into iiNet Key Witnesses

Tags: afact, allegations, been-identified, closing, cobden, detail-on-iinet, federal, federal-court, hollywood, iinet, instances, studios, told-the-court