AFACT vs iiNet Appeal Begins: “3-Strikes for Spam Not BitTorrent?”
Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) tells court that the Aussie ISP could have taken reasonable steps to sanction file-sharing subscribers in the same way that it does those who make threatening calls or send spam email. Day 1 of the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft’s (AFACT) appeal of its loss to iiNet took place
Continued here:
AFACT vs iiNet Appeal Begins: “3-Strikes for Spam Not BitTorrent?”
You might also like
|
|
|
|
|
Leave a Reply
Exclusive Usenet Offers: $7.95/month
Usenet Tips
Net News
- Holder Should Demand Feds Get a Warrant to Read Our E-mail
- TrafficPrivacy Launches Anonymous BitTorrent Client
- The Two-Factor Authentication Controversy
- A Year And 20 Million Takedown Requests Later, The Music Industry Is Still Grieving
- IP Addresses Don’t Positively Identify Infringers, Anti-Piracy Lawfirm Says
- Film Industry Interested in New Anti-Piracy Device Developed by Kerala Software Engineer
- WikiLeaks Donations Down to a Trickle
- Kim Dotcom Claims Ownership of Two-Factor Authentication
- Twitter Amplify Offers Real-Time Videos in Its Stream
- Hurt Locker Makers Sue Attorney for Being “Prolific” BitTorrent Pirate
Categories
