Judge: ringtones aren’t performances, so no royalties

If you have been blessing everyone around you with cell phone “performances” of Beyoncé’s “Single Ladies,” rest assured that your cell phone provider won’t have to pay royalties on it. A federal court has ruled that ringtones played aloud in public are not infringing on the content owners’ copyrights because they don’t constitute a true performance. (In other news, children are still allowed to sing songs without paying royalties.) Joking aside (actually, that’s less of a joke than you might think), the ringtone argument was made by the American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers (ASCAP) earlier this year when it sued certain mobile carriers in the US in an attempt to force them to

You might also like

Ringtones aren’t performances: ruling p2pnet news view Music | Mobiles:- ASCAP recently sued AT&T, claiming each time a cellphone ringtone...

Judge: Mobile Phone Ringtones are Not Concerts A federal judge has dismissed the music industry contention that when a cell phone’s ringtone...

SCOTUS lets stand ruling that downloads are not performances The Supreme Court left in place a ruling by a New York federal appeals court, which determined that...

ASCAP Demands Additional Performance Tax for Ringtones You got yourself a brand new cell phone. You then go do the honest thing and pay that huge amount of...

Tags: already-paying, article, carriers, companion-photo, copyright, eff, lawsuit, media/news, mobile-carriers, news, payments-weren, ringtone, royalties