Let digital nation ’see and hear’ Tenenbaum v RIAA

Harvard professor Charles Nesson and his team of Harvard Law students have filed a petition to re-hear Joel Tenenbaum vs the RIAA en banc, and request for stay of next week’s trial hearing on his challenge to the constitutionality of the million dollar complaint brought against him. En banc is a French term used to refer to the hearing of a legal case where all judges of a court will hear the case, rather than a panel of them, explains the Wikipedia . “Restricting our ability to make this judicial process accessible to the digital nation of which Joel is representative irreparably harms our case by encasing it a building that is a fortress and a recording only in text which cannot be immediately accessed and which my client and his digital generation cannot afford,” says Nesson in an email to chief judge Mark Wolf.

See more here: 
Let digital nation ’see and hear’ Tenenbaum v RIAA

Related posts:

1. etc: The RIAA has withdrawn a motion for sanctions against Harvard Law professor Charles Nesson in the Joel Tenenbaum case.
2. RIAA v Tenenbaum: what might have been
3. John Perry Barlow on RIAA v Tenenbaum
4. Joel v the RIAA: ‘curiouser and curiouser’

Tags: internet, judicial, legal, legitimate, press, the-discussions, united-states