Porn Can’t Be Copyrighted, Says FileSharing Defendant
In recent news the Hard Drive Productions (an adult movie production studio) versus “Does” who allegedly downloaded their materials case has taken an interesting turn when a woman accused of downloading “Amateur Allure Jen” claimed that copyright laws do not apply to adult clips since they’re not copyrightable, the ArsTechnica report reveals. The woman in question is Liuxia Wong of Solano County, California, and her petition for declaratory relief explains to the federal court in San Francisco: Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution defines the purpose of copyright: “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” And since acronyms like P.O.V. or M.I.L.F. are not to be associated with keywords like “science” and “useful arts”, they do not qualify under copyright laws, do they? Therefore, “copyright is authorized only for works which promote the progress of science and the useful arts,” said the woman’s lawyer. “Early Circuit law in California held that obscene works did not promote the progress of science and the useful arts, and thus cannot be protected by copyright,” the brief also notes, while underlining this point several times: Hard Drive’s work does not promote the progress of science.

See the original post here:
Porn Can’t Be Copyrighted, Says FileSharing Defendant
You might also like
|
|
|
|
|
Leave a Reply
Special Usenet Offers: $10/month
Net News
- To Warrant or Not To Warrant? ACLU and Police Clash Over Mobile Phone Location Data
- Comcast suspends 250GB data cap—for now
- Facebook pokes major hole in a Yahoo patent claim
- Viacom, Time Warner kiss and make up over iOS app streaming
- TPB Saga Continues: Pirate Bay and Wikileaks Struck by Mystery DDoS Attacks
- Joel Tenenbaum Takes His File-Sharing Case to the Supreme Court
- The Pirate Bay, Wikileaks Under DDOS Attack, Source Unclear




