RIAA Rejects Reduced File-Sharing Judgment

After having offered to settle the case with Jammie Thomas for as little as $25,000, down from the $1.92 million original verdict, and from the most recent $54,000 judgment reduction on appeal. Last Friday the case of accused file-sharer Jammie Thomas grew more complex after Judge Davis of the United States District Court lowered the original $1.92 million verdict against Jammie Thomas, the first person convicted of illegal file-sharing in the US, from $80,000 per song to $2,250 per song, saying “statutory damages must still bear some relation to actual damages.” If you recall, back in June 2009, the jury awarded the recording industry $1.92 million in statutory damages as a punishment for using the KaZaA file-sharing program to download 24 songs which amounted to $80,000 per song. “The need for deterrence cannot justify a $2 million verdict for stealing and illegally distributing 24 songs for the sole purpose of obtaining free music,” reads the ruling .

Continued here: 
RIAA Rejects Reduced File-Sharing Judgment

Stumbleupon

Related posts:

  1. Judge: Deterrence Cannot Justify $2 million P2P Verdict
  2. RIAA Seeks up to $150,000 a Song in File Sharing Trial
  3. RIAA Fears Thomas Keeps File Sharing, Despite $2 Million Verdict
  4. $675,000 RIAA File Sharing Verdict is ‘Unreasonable’

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 28th, 2010 P2P News

Leave a Reply