Should Internet Access be a Civil Right?

Critics of “three-strikes” laws think society risks disenfranchising large segments of the population, especially with outdated copyright laws more relevant to a world before digital distribution. In an age of growing attempts by copyright holders to implement so-called “three-strikes” legislation to deal with online piracy, some think Internet disconnection for accused file-sharers could raise concerns over the “right to freedom of expression.” ”It’s a social inclusion question,” says Cyberspace Law and Policy Centre executive director David Vaile. He warns that disconnecting people from the Internet in many ways disconnects them from society, and that particularly restrictive Australian copyright laws increases the risk that it will happen.

Original post:
Should Internet Access be a Civil Right?

You might also like

New Zealand Govt Slowly Resurrecting “Three-Strikes”
Hollywood warns it must still include Internet disconnection, “an ultimate sanction to show we’re...

Finland Makes Internet Access a Fundamental Right
Country’s communication minister Suvi Linden says that “Internet services are no longer...

Kiwi “3-Strikes” Critics Compare Internet to Phone, Electricity
Members of Internet NZ and the Creative Freedom Foundation tell New Zealand Commerce Select Committee...

US, NZ, Sweden, others condemn "three strikes" Internet laws
Earlier this month we covered a UN report that argued that "three strikes" laws that deprive alleged...

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, June 4th, 2010 Net News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags are not allowed.

Autoblogging Software