SOPA, Internet regulation, and the economics of piracy

Earlier this month, I detailed at some length why claims about the purported economic harms of piracy, offered by supporters of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and PROTECT-IP Act (PIPA), ought to be treated with much more skepticism than they generally get from journalists and policymakers.  My own view is that this ought to be rather secondary to the policy discussion: SOPA and PIPA would be ineffective mechanisms for addressing the problem, and a terrible idea for many other reasons , even if the numbers were exactly right. No matter how bad last season’s crops were, witch burnings are a poor policy response.  Fortunately, legislators finally seem to be cottoning on to this : SOPA now appears to be on ice for the time being, and PIPA’s own sponsors are having second thoughts about mucking with the Internet’s Domain Name System. Read the comments on this post

Here is the original:
SOPA, Internet regulation, and the economics of piracy

You might also like

Global piracy claims: report p2pnet view P2P:- The Social Science Research Council has released its much-anticipated study on media...

Economics backs net neutrality, say researchers The dollar has spoken Net neutrality is not just the fairest way to organise the internet but the most...

SOPA backer reassures his troops: "Facts will overcome fears" The key backer of the Stop Online Piracy Act, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), continues to talk up his willingness...

EMI Boss Opposes SOPA, Says Piracy is a Service Issue In recent weeks millions of people have spoken out against the pending PIPA and SOPA anti-piracy bills,...

Tags: burnings, domain, journalists, legislators, mechanisms, piracy, response, skepticism, sopa, thoughts, witch