<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>ShareConnector &#187; identity-last</title> <atom:link href="http://www.shareconnector.com/tag/identity-last/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.shareconnector.com</link> <description>Connecting the Share Community</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Court case shows limits of anonymous blogging</title><link>http://www.shareconnector.com/court-case-shows-limits-of-anonymous-blogging</link> <comments>http://www.shareconnector.com/court-case-shows-limits-of-anonymous-blogging#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>AgentSmith</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[P2P News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[anonymous]]></category> <category><![CDATA[companion-photo]]></category> <category><![CDATA[estate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[first-amendment]]></category> <category><![CDATA[identity-last]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet]]></category> <category><![CDATA[judge-denied]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category> <category><![CDATA[policy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[real]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tech policy/news]]></category> <category><![CDATA[verge]]></category> <category><![CDATA[web]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shareconnector.com/court-case-shows-limits-of-anonymous-blogging</guid> <description><![CDATA[ US courts have historically looked on anonymous bloggers and commenters with a sympathetic eye, but there are exceptions. A Tennessee judge denied a blogger's motion to quash a subpoena to reveal his identity last week, and he also denied a motion to dismiss the case. With few other options available to him (or her), the blogger in Swartz v. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> US courts have historically looked on anonymous bloggers and commenters with a sympathetic eye, but there are exceptions. A Tennessee judge denied a blogger&#8217;s motion to quash a subpoena to reveal his identity last week, and he also denied a motion to dismiss the case. With few other options available to him (or her), the blogger in Swartz v.</p><p><img src="http://www.shareconnector.com/wp-content/uploads/7b96e6f83a9271-f-150x84.jpg" /></p><p>View post:<br /> <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/10/anonymous-real-estate-critic-on-the-verge-of-being-unmasked.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss" title="Court case shows limits of anonymous blogging">Court case shows limits of anonymous blogging</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.shareconnector.com/court-case-shows-limits-of-anonymous-blogging/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

Served from: www.shareconnector.com @ 2010-07-31 04:22:28 -->